QUIC.cloud vs Cloudflare comparison is difficult to do. Both the CDNs are reverse proxy providers. We have different servers hosted by GoDaddy, SiteGround, DreamHost, HostGator etc hosting services. Then there are shared hosting, VPS, Cloud hosting of different plans.

To do an accurate QUIC.cloud vs Cloudflare, you need a LiteSpeed Web Server. LiteSpeed Technologies is optimized for WordPress technology. QUIC.cloud works only with the LiteSpeed Cache plugin. Cloudflare can be used with any kind of web server like Apache, Nginx, Debian, Ubuntu etc.

LiteSpeed Cache plugin is the front-end of LiteSpeed server system. QUIC.cloud facilitates a LiteSpeed server when it is not available. In addition page caching, image optimization, CDN services are provided.

To compare QUIC.cloud and Cloudflare, we need to use a website with LiteSpeed Server. Then run the speed tests with QUIC.cloud and Cloudflare separately. We have an article from QUIC.cloud where the advantages of using Cloudflare and QUIC.cloud are mentioned.

QUIC.cloud does both dynamic and static caching. But a free Cloudflare plan does only static caching. To implement WordPress dynamic caching you need Automatic Platform Optimization (APO) service which costs $5/month.

Case Study of QUIC.cloud vs Cloudflare

As many WordPress users like to do, they want to use both QUIC.cloud and Cloudflare with a LiteSpeed Server. Another case is when they have a non-LiteSpeed server like Apache and use LiteSpeed cache plugin. Then they want to link with Cloudflare CDN.

Both of them not only provide CDN, but also provide security rules, protect from DDoS attacks, browser hijacks and many others.

For our case study we are going to take two sites with the following configuration.

  1. ThinkMinds – QUIC.cloud + LiteSpeed Cache + LiteSpeed Server
  1. WPReviewTips – Cloudflare + LiteSpeed Cache + Apache Web Server

This is not an ideal situation to compare. But as many WordPress users like to do so, we are doing this comparison to see the results.

CDN Ideal Settings 2022

To configure both the CDNs, we have used the following settings on QUIC.cloud and Cloudflare.

  1. QUIC.cloud Ideal Settings of 2022.
  2. Cloudflare Ideal Settings of 2022

With these settings set, one article from each site is tested using the GTMetrix test and PageSpeed Insights testing tools.

GTMetrix Test – QUIC.cloud vs Cloudflare



  • Total Page Size – 677KB
  • Total Page Requests – 87
  • GTMetrix Grade – C
  • LCP – 3.4s
  • CLS – 0.11
  • TTFB – 3.2s
  • Fully Loaded Time – 3.9s


  • Total Page Size – 53.6 KB
  • Total Page Requests – 5
  • GTMetrix Grade – A
  • LCP – 635ms
  • CLS – 0
  • TTFB – 84ms
  • Fully Loaded Time – 725ms

PageSpeed Insights – QUIC.cloud vs Cloudflare



  • Performance – 75
  • FCP – 0.4s
  • LCP – 2.4s
  • CLS – 0.006


  • Performance – 100
  • FCP – 0.4s
  • LCP – 0.4s
  • CLS – 0



  • Performance – 39
  • FCP – 2.8s
  • LCP – 7.2s
  • CLS – 0.058


  • Performance – 100
  • FCP – 1.4s
  • LCP – 1.5s
  • CLS – 0


From the above results, it is crystal clear that Cloudflare does not work well with LiteSpeed Cache and Apache web server. For more accurate results, we need to test with LiteSpeed Server and Cloudflare.

On the other hand, QUIC.cloud works the best with LiteSpeed Cache. WordPress optimization is done well with this kind of setup. In the QUIC.cloud vs Cloudflare comparison, the former does well with outstanding core web vitals and speed.

To make Cloudflare work, you need to use WP Rocket. In this LiteSpeed Cache vs WP Rocket results, we could see that Cloudflare produced far much better results with WP Rocket.

I recommend using WP Rocket + Cloudflare for small sites and static pages. But for ecommerce sites where dynamic pages are important, then LiteSpeed Cache + QUIC.cloud works well. This recommendation has already been given on the QUIC. cloud knowledge base article.

This case-study proves that.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.